Audience feedback summary

Audience feedback summary

Question 1) How would you rate the success of the production in terms of following codes and conventions of a game advert?

 Excellent – Good – Average – Poor – Very Poor

100% of our audience gave us an ‘excellent’ for this question after viewing both our adverts and our print artifacts. This clearly shows the success and professionalism of our project.

Question 2) From the evidence you have seen on the blog, how well planned was the production?

Excellent 1    2     3     4    5 Poor

Once again 100% of our audience gave us either a 1 or a 2 for this question with 60% giving us a 1 for excellent and the remaining 40% giving us a 2 for just below excellent. This shows a small degree of improvement that we could try and take into account if we were to do the project again.

Question 3) Would you say the production showed evidence of: No Imagination, Some Imagination, Little Imagination or High Imagination & Creative Flair

85% of our responses said that we used high imagination and creative flair within our production. The other 15% gave us the next highest answer saying we used some imagination; this was probably because our game cover looked very similar to the existing game covers. We followed the conventions very closely which is why it looks the same but we did this to try and make the cover more recognizable for the audience.

Question 4) The following refers to the technical aspects of the piece. Please rate the following on a scale of one to five (1 being excellent, 5 being poor)

Shot composition, Mise-en-scene, Editing, Sound and music, Fonts and text.

60% of our responses gave us a combination of 1’s and 2’s for this question, this was very promising as it was a very positive overview of all the aspects of our project. 30% gave us a combination of 2’s and 3’s and although this was lower than the first 60% it was still pleasing as it was still fairly positive and also gave us a target to improve for our next production. The final 10% of the responses gave us a combination of 1’s, 2’s and 3’s which was also still pleasing as the majority were still all above ‘good’ on the scale.

Question 5) How could the production be improved?

The main consensus of our responses said that we could have left our information on the screen for longer to let the audience have more of a chance to read it. We left it on for the short time we did because it was the copyright information, we didn’t think many people would want to read it thoroughly but we had to put it in for legal reasons.  Another improvement was that we could have been more unique and less like other games, we chose to make our covers similar to that of a normal game advert to make it recognizable to the audience therefore making the game more popular.

Question 6) How well do the print artifacts tie in to the main production?

This was probably the most positive response out of the entire questionnaire as we received comments like ‘the game cover looks real’ ‘brilliant’ and ‘like a new released game!’.100% of the audience said positive comments about our print artifacts, which was pleasing as we spent a lot of time creating them.

Written by Josh, Dan and Ash